Whoever pays the rent gets the master bedroom, right? That seems to be the thinking in newsrooms as well. So advertisers can get the choicest of spaces, because they help the newspaper to meet its bottom line obligations. Where commercial interests lord over public interest, emaciating editorial to fatten advertising fatcats is fine.
And when that finally happens, albeit after the tragic loss of many lives, does that story warrant front page prominence?
For all the major dailies, that was an easy decision to make. But one particular paper opted to seize the moment and pull a 'brilliant' marketing stunt.
The headline was there alright, just to show the editors were aware of the biggest news story then.
But it looked as if the single sentence was intruding on the space reserved for a 'glorious ' advert.
Why should even a good story, laden with public interest elements, come in the way of a full colour sales pitch, and ruin the chance for the audience to grab a great bargain?
Sadly, you can't entirely blame the paper for focusing on who butters their bread. Somebody has to pay their bills you know, and leave sufficient profit to excite shareholders.
Enter the reign of adverts, exit news content being king!